PRELIMINARY SQYX GOODWIN ICC COMPLAINT GUIDELINE : SQYX versus EIIR : STATE versus SOVEREIGN ACTOR : ICC / ICJ COMPLAINT

CAVEAT : SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST : CAVEAT

TWO ROW WAMPUM : BACKGROUNDER :  CLASS ACTION SUIT

SQYX vs EIIR  OVERVIEW : SQYX vs EIIR

MICRO & MACRO COMPLAINT STRATEGIES

THE PARTIES

  1. COMPLAINANT : RALPH CHARLES SQYX GOODWIN – KWA’MUTSUN, TURTLE ISLAND NORTH
  2. RESPONDENT : ELIZABETH II – CANADA MONARCH, QUEEN OF UNITED KINGDOM; COMMONWEALTH HEAD OF STATE : WINDSOR nee SAXE COBURG UNDT GOTHA

PRINCIPAL ISSUE OF PIRACY TRESPASS

EIIR CANADA HISTORICAL AND MODERN ERA UNJUST ENRICHMENT VIA CRIMES Of PIRACY ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH VIOLATIONS OF UN CHARTER; INCL, CHAPTER  SEVEN; ACHIEVED THROUGH CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND PRACTISED GENOCIDE : GENERAL BREACHES OF SOVEREIGN KWA’MUTSUN LAW : INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO EIIR CANADA ADOPTED INTERNATIONAL LAW RESPONSIBILITIES TO CONDUCT STATE AFFAIRS WITHIN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS


 

SYNOPSIS

EIIR CROWN CANADA CIVIL AND CRIMINAL HARM EXECUTED UPON SQYX GOODWIN

  1. KWA’MUTSUN & CROWN CANADA TWIN CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY LEGISLATION
  2. UNITED NATIONS & ICC / ICJ JURISDICTION TO RECEIVE SQYX GOODWIN COMPLAINT
  3. ICC / ICJ DECISION IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
  4. CROWN CANADA – ELIZABETH II – HAS ADEQUATE ASSETS TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL RELIEF IN MATTERS OF COMPETENT LEGAL COUNSEL & CIVIL DAMAGES RELIEF TO COMPLAINANT – AS CHARGED IN 2005

THE PRINCIPAL COMPLAINT ISSUE

  1. EIIR INCARCERATED SQYX GOODWIN IN ABSENCE OF JUST OR GOOD CAUSE
  2. SQYX GOODWIN OBJECTED TO THE SAID INCARCERATION & IMPOSED FINANCIAL AWARD
  3. KWA’MUTSUN HEAD OF STATE COMPLAINT AGAINST EIIR CANADA TRESPASS
  4. ELIZABETH II – QUEEN OF CANADA & COMMMONWEALTH SERVED NOTICE
  5. UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND SECURITY COUNSEL APPRISED

 UPDATED COMPLAINT STRATEGY TO ICC PROSECUTOR : KWA’MUTSUN ROME STATUTE

  1. PRINCIPAL COMPLAINT PREVAILS
  2. RECONCILIATION HAS FAILED
  3. RESPONDEWNT PARTIES ARE SERVED NOTICE OF COMPLAINT
  4. RESPONDENT PARTIES ARE SERVED WITH COMPLAINANT PROCEEDING TO ICC
  5. IN ABSENCE OF COUNSEL
  6. KWAMUTSUN DIRECTIVE TO PROCEED
  7. FACTUM RECORDS
  8. TRANSCRIPTS SCBC 67804
  9. 2005 SQYX LETTER EXCHANGE WITH EIIR REGARDING STATE FUNDED COUNSEL

COMPLAINANT PRELIMINARY BRIEF ELECTRONICALLY SUBMITTED TO ICC PROSECUTOR OFFICE – INCLUDING NOTICE OF SUBSTANTIVE GENERAL LEGAL COUNSEL COMPLAINT FORTHCOMING

  1. KWA’MUTSUN 2013 COMPLAINT
  2. SQYX GOODWIN, ET AL, COMPLAINT REGISTERED IN ERA 2005 – 2022

ORDER SOUGHT

STEP ONE : AS PER SQYX GOODWIN – EIIR LETER EXCHANGES : UNSC SEIZES EIIR (ET AL) ASSETS INTO TRUST FOR PURPOSES OF PROVIDING ADEQUATE FUNDING FOR SQYX GOODWIN CHOSEN LEGAL COUNSEL

STEP TWO :  SQYX GOODWIN COMPLAINT MATTERS BEFORE THE ICC

SQYX GOODWIN vs EIIR TRIAL BEFORE ICJ IS CONDUCTED SIMULTANEOUSLY

ICC DECISION AFFIRMS SQYX GOODWIN COMPLAINT AGAINST EIIR FOR TRIAL

EIIR DETAINED INTO ICC ARREST FOR TRIAL ON COMPLAINTS REGISTRED BY SQYX GOODWIN – TRIAL PROCEEDS WITH EIIR IN ABSENTIA WHERE NECESSARY

ICC RENDERS AFFIRMATIVE DECISION IN FAVOUR OF SQYX GOODWIN VS EIIR (ET AL)

ICC CONDUCTS EIIR INTO SENTENCED DETAINMENT

ICC RECOGNIZES ICJ CIVIL AWARD TO SQYX GOODWIN AGAINST EIIR

CAVEAT : SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST : CAVEAT

TWO ROW WAMPUM : BACKGROUNDER :  CLASS ACTION SUIT

SQYX vs EIIR  :  OVERVIEW : SQYX vs EIIR